Cottage Corner

Fulham Football Club

Now that Hughes is back

Views: 472

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

I don't think that's why, he's missed several headers. I think the more decisive difference is both full backs are playing well.

Well I suppose it is just a massive coincidence then. Hughes is back and the other 3 defenders look much more solid. Go figure!

He worried me today, his positioning was great as always but his heading was really poor. I don't see what his return has to do with the full backs playing well. I think more than anything else they were just really up for it today. Riise had a flawless game, the best he's had since being here. Kelly had a good first half but a bit shaky in the second, just as well Etherington was poor.

St Eve said:

Well I suppose it is just a massive coincidence then. Hughes is back and the other 3 defenders look much more solid. Go figure!

It is all about confidence. The defence doesn't have to worry about a Senderos mistake. Hughes is solid, does his job allowing everyone else to do their respective jobs

John Smith said:

He worried me today, his positioning was great as always but his heading was really poor. I don't see what his return has to do with the full backs playing well. I think more than anything else they were just really up for it today. Riise had a flawless game, the best he's had since being here. Kelly had a good first half but a bit shaky in the second, just as well Etherington was poor.

St Eve said:

Well I suppose it is just a massive coincidence then. Hughes is back and the other 3 defenders look much more solid. Go figure!

He did make mistakes though, he missed or misdirected lots of headers. Senderos has a bad habit of marking too tight but he never misses headers. I don't buy this argument that he unsettles our defence.

St Eve said:

It is all about confidence. The defence doesn't have to worry about a Senderos mistake. Hughes is solid, does his job allowing everyone else to do their respective jobs

John Smith said:

He worried me today, his positioning was great as always but his heading was really poor. I don't see what his return has to do with the full backs playing well. I think more than anything else they were just really up for it today. Riise had a flawless game, the best he's had since being here. Kelly had a good first half but a bit shaky in the second, just as well Etherington was poor.

St Eve said:

Well I suppose it is just a massive coincidence then. Hughes is back and the other 3 defenders look much more solid. Go figure!

He had a pretty solid game and always looked comfortable. No stupid fouls and no lapses in concentration. 

John Smith said:

He did make mistakes though, he missed or misdirected lots of headers. Senderos has a bad habit of marking too tight but he never misses headers. I don't buy this argument that he unsettles our defence.

St Eve said:

It is all about confidence. The defence doesn't have to worry about a Senderos mistake. Hughes is solid, does his job allowing everyone else to do their respective jobs

John Smith said:

He worried me today, his positioning was great as always but his heading was really poor. I don't see what his return has to do with the full backs playing well. I think more than anything else they were just really up for it today. Riise had a flawless game, the best he's had since being here. Kelly had a good first half but a bit shaky in the second, just as well Etherington was poor.

St Eve said:

Well I suppose it is just a massive coincidence then. Hughes is back and the other 3 defenders look much more solid. Go figure!

Hughes is better on the deck and in the prem thats what matters more, I'd pick Hughes every time.

agree with your post 100% St Eve.

the fact that Hughes hasn't started for a long time just demonstrates the fact that Jol is clueless and that he is an incompetent manager. He dropped our most consistent player over the past couple of seasons for....wait for it....PHILIPPE SENDEROS!!!!! (possibly the biggest bungling oaf of a centre back bar Titus Bramble)

Well I'm to go against the tide and say our good defensive performance had nothing to do with Hughes, that Hughes made at least three errors today more than Senderos usually does and that Senderos is wrongly victimised. Hughes is a good defender and we've missed his positioning at times but he could've cost us goals today by missing so many headers.

If Hughes plays more often he will always be better than Senderos,Hughes has a brain.


It is not about about Senderos being victimised. Maybe use wasn't perfect but he was pretty damn good. I don't recall the so called errors but I will take another look but clearly they weren't game changing. Hughes is not match fit and will get back to his usual consistent self as he has for many years. senderos is an accident waiting to happen. He is younger and hopefully will learn. Until then Welcome back Mr. Hughes
John Smith said:

Well I'm to go against the tide and say our good defensive performance had nothing to do with Hughes, that Hughes made at least three errors today more than Senderos usually does and that Senderos is wrongly victimised. Hughes is a good defender and we've missed his positioning at times but he could've cost us goals today by missing so many headers.

Reply to Discussion

RSS

Latest Activity

OSTRICH WATCH (THE) replied to Logicalman's discussion 'Tipping League: Final Positions 2011-12'
"He's an idiot. You sound like one, too. "
9 seconds ago
Alex B posted a discussion

Barry out of Euros

Seems strange that Jagielka is the replacement. Surely, if Henderson is on standby, a like-for-like swap would make more sense?See More
7 minutes ago
ORGANIC WHITE replied to OSTRICH WATCH (THE)'s discussion 'When the Americans have gone, I vote we pick on people from Kent and Sussex'
"I reckon it's another of Tizzard's.  But there's so many of them it's hard to tell sometimes. "
12 minutes ago
dikranovich replied to EtuhuForNigeria's discussion 'Yanks... Please sign this bill of commitment to the club no matter what happens to Dempsey.'
"if michael bradley comes to fulham, he is not eventually replacing anybody.  it would be with immediate effect.  please dont let alex mcleish do your thinking for you.  "
16 minutes ago
ORGANIC WHITE replied to EtuhuForNigeria's discussion 'Why does everyone get confused between talent and technical ability?'
"Is keepy-uppy a talent or a technical ability?  I'm not sure but if forced I'd say technical ability.  However I wouldn't want the world record keepy-uppy player on my team.  No I wouldn't. Is landing a long pass…"
16 minutes ago
WhiteJC replied to WhiteJC's discussion 'Monday Fulham Stuff (28/05/12)...'
"...additional stories...   http://bit.ly/L6QH8d http://bit.ly/Ky8KFk ;"
16 minutes ago
Skidrow replied to Logicalman's discussion 'Tipping League: Final Positions 2011-12'
"Could my points total for week 38 be included? I'm listed for a 0 and look back at week 38. I played and scored."
19 minutes ago
Terrance Booker replied to OSTRICH WATCH (THE)'s discussion 'When the Americans have gone, I vote we pick on people from Kent and Sussex'
"Is OSTRICH WATCH (THE) a puppet of the original OSTRICH WATCH or is it someone completely different?"
19 minutes ago

© 2012   Created by Fulham FC.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service